1/f fluctuation is one way researchers describe variation in some natural sounds and biological signals. It is an interesting lens for noticing a forest—not proof that a particular rhythm will calm every visitor.
What we noticed at Manza
At the Manza Nature Information Centre in Gunma, an exhibition introduced us to 1/f fluctuation and the work of physicist Toshimitsu Musha. It gave us another reason to pay attention to changing light, water and sound. An exhibition explanation is not the same as a clinical test of our Hakone sessions.
What 1/f does—and does not—mean
The term describes a statistical pattern in variation across frequencies. Some natural phenomena show approximately 1/f-like patterns. It does not follow that every stream, bird call, patch of sunlight or heartbeat follows the same pattern, or that the pattern predicts a person’s response.
A metronome, white noise and a forest soundscape are different listening experiences. We do not need to label one universally stressful or another universally healing to notice those differences.
Keep the research in perspective
Research comparing forest and urban settings has reported short-term differences in stress markers and mood. These studies do not establish 1/f fluctuation as the single cause. Environment, activity, attention, expectations and company can all differ between study conditions.
Claims about alpha waves or an automatic nervous-system “switch” go further than we can support for an individual guest. Our sessions are a wellbeing experience, not a treatment, and we do not measure or promise a medical response.


What this changes on a walk
Very little needs to be added. Listen beside the water. Notice how light changes on bark. Pause long enough to become interested in a detail. These are invitations to pay attention, not tests to pass.
Rest may mean sitting, standing quietly or lying on a mat when conditions and comfort allow. You can decline any invitation. A rainy day or a preference to stay seated does not make the session incomplete.
Read the studies, then choose your experience
- Park et al. (2010): field experiments in 24 Japanese forests.
- Antonelli, Barbieri & Donelli (2019): systematic review and cortisol meta-analysis. The authors discuss short-term results, limited data and possible expectation effects.
- Li (2022): review of forest-environment research.
For our wider discussion of findings and limits, read what forest bathing research shows. To plan the practical day, compare the Introductory and Lakeshore experiences.
Walk with us in Hakone
Slow guided forest bathing with time for sensory attention and comfortable rest. Aki guides in English and French; Mandarin and Cantonese with Carmen are available by enquiry.
Plan a forest bathing experience in JapanThe Manza exhibition inspired these personal observations. Research links above support a broader discussion of forest environments; they do not establish a 1/f mechanism for our sessions. This article is not medical advice.